Constructive Collective Bargaining as Panacea to ASUU VS FGN Face-Off: 2009-2025 Debate

Abstract

This study examined constructive collective bargaining as a panacea to ASUU–FGN face-off (2009–2025 Debates). Using a quantitative design, data were gathered from a sample of 384 academic staff drawn from institutions across Nigeria’s six geopolitical zones using a multidimensional sampling technique. Reliable instrument with Cronbach’s α > .70 was administered and analyzed with SPSS v27 Multiple regression results indicate the model explains a substantial proportion of variance in the ASUU–FGN face-off (R² = .536; F(3, 368) = 51.894, p = .000 < .05 sig level). The study found that all the three predictors included in the study had statistically significant negative influence on the face-off between ASUU and Federal Government of Nigeria with transparency and trust-building (β = −.347, p < .05), dialogue and conflict management mechanisms (β = −.321, p < .05), and timely implementation of agreements (β = −.298, p = .05). The study concludes that constructive collective bargaining remains a potent panacea for fostering sustainable industrial harmony between ASUU and the FGN, with transparency and trust-building emerging as the most decisive factor. Thus, the study recommends that (i) the Federal Government and ASUU institutionalize transparent negotiation practices and proactive fiscal disclosure; (ii) the government establish dedicated budgetary provisions, monitoring frameworks, and clear timelines to guarantee timely implementation of agreements; and (iii) both parties adopt formalized, problem-solving dialogue structures (grievance channels, mediation, and negotiator training) to prevent and manage disputes. These measures together position constructive collective bargaining as a practical panacea for sustainable industrial harmony in Nigerian higher education.